Re: Time out!
Re: Time out!
- Subject: Re: Time out!
- From: Alan Ward <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:25:46 -0600
Mixing wod definitions in with html is simply rude :-) It makes refactoring even more of a pain than it alreadyis (with KVC) as now you have another set of files in which references may be found.
Alan
On Aug 12, 2006, at 3:17 PM, Anjo Krank wrote:
Am 12.08.2006 um 23:03 schrieb Chuck Hill:
An import point to consider here is that we are not limited to this traditional implementation. The only restriction that the WO frameworks place is that there is an implementation for
public WOElement template()
I have seen (I think it was another of David Terans "do it like this" examples that allowed there to me no .wod file, with the HTML containing (for example)
<WebObject name="Foo" WOComponent="WOHyperlink" class="bigLink" string=linkTitle/>
I have that code here somewhere. Allegedly, the problem is that extra parsing step that makes startup times larger, in fact this was the reason why these absurd .wo packages were created in the first place. Another problem is the ambiguity between strings and dynamic parts.
|
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden