Re: WebObjects Foundation
Re: WebObjects Foundation
- Subject: Re: WebObjects Foundation
- From: "Marc Oesch" <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 03:29:17 +0200
Yes, of course. I didn't mean that we should build Wikis etc to use for
the WebObjects Foundation.
I'm relieved :)
I meantmindshare is created by providing
working solutions.
Apache became a powerhouse because they built/supported a fully
functional
Showing how WOnderful WO
is with
working applications will do the trick.
Completely agree with you.
The thing that bugs me most at the moment: There doesn't seem to be a
ready *open-source* WO CMS as foundation for such efforts - not only
speaking about community effort and sites.
Such an expandable CMS could be a starting point for working
applications. Extensions could be added later on, eg. adding blogs,
galleries, calendar...as others suggested.
I listed some options I'm aware of below. I haven't seen the last one
(Pachyderm) talked about on this list, Pachyderm 2.0 is rather new...
I hope people with more experience can jump in and suggest which is
the best one to move forward...
- "Generic" Java CMS
Lenya
http://lenya.apache.org/
Magnolia
http://www.magnolia.info/en/magnolia.html
OpenCMS
http://www.opencms.org/opencms/en/
– WO CMS
GVC Sitemaker
http://www.gvcsitemaker.com/marketing/download
OCE
http://sourceforge.net/projects/oce
PWDA.com
http://www.pwda.com/cgi-bin/WebObjects/PWDA.woa
Pachyderm 2.x
http://www.pachyderm.org/developers.html
...
Others ?
Marc
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden