• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: WebObjects Foundation
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WebObjects Foundation


  • Subject: Re: WebObjects Foundation
  • From: Arturo PĂ©rez <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:07:31 -0400


On Aug 21, 2006, at 8:02 PM, Marc Oesch wrote:

I'm all for for more WO source code and building blocks for generic
funtionality as  Arturo suggested, but this may take some months.

We could always gradually switch over as more and more tools become
available written in WebObjects.


Yes, of course.  I didn't mean that we should build Wikis etc to use for
the WebObjects Foundation.  I meantmindshare is created by providing
working solutions.

Apache became a powerhouse because they built/supported a fully functional
HTTP server that had all the bells and whistles necessary. Ditto for Struts,
Hibernate, etc.


Talking about how WOnderful WO is will buy us nothing (or, like the old joke,
that and 5 bucks will get you a Starbucks). Showing how WOnderful WO is with
working applications will do the trick.


-arturo

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: WebObjects Foundation
      • From: "Marc Oesch" <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: WebObjects Foundation (From: "Marc Oesch" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: XCode 2.3 --> XCode 2.4 [and WebObjects 5.3.2]
  • Next by Date: WO Community Web site
  • Previous by thread: Re: WebObjects Foundation
  • Next by thread: Re: WebObjects Foundation
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread