• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: WWDC WO Meet
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WWDC WO Meet


  • Subject: Re: WWDC WO Meet
  • From: Daniel DeCovnick <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 12:39:16 -0700

Close enough to not multi-user, anyway... 97% of the time one person would be using it, and on the few occasions when someone else needed it, it'd be just as easy to make a copy of the data file, or to have the other person use the computer it'd be on, as it would to access a web app from another computer. Since it's a smallish project though, and I'd really like to get a full WO app written, it's no problem for me to do both the CD and WO app at the same time.

And yes, I'd LOVE it if Apple brought back Objective-C for WebObjects... since nearly all the EOF code is still present (even if Apple removed the headers from the Obj-C EOControl and EOAccess frameworks in 5.3, boo) and is only missing a couple classes to be up to date, and EOModeler can still generate Objective-C classes... would it really be so bad to put Objective-C support back in to the WebObjects half of it? Apple? Pretty please? I'd even be happy to be only able to deploy WO-Obj-C apps on OS X...

Also, I think I forgot to mention it, but Monday is the good day for me as well.

-Dan

On Jul 12, 2006, at 1:32 AM, Guido Neitzer wrote:

On 12.07.2006, at 10:06 Uhr, Daniel DeCovnick wrote:

It started with the modeling - it's easier in CoreData because one doesn't have to worry about mapping to database tables - no primary keys, no join tables for many-to-many relationships... It's got a faster learning curve...

Hmmm. Okay. Maybe. Can't speak for myself.

Also I prefer Objective-C to Java. :-p.

Who doesn't? [I WANT WO FOR OBJECTIVE-C BACK! Apple, can you hear me?]

It's not both. It's a fairly simple history tracker with a database or database-ish backend. Could be done near as easily in PHP/MySQL or C++ (if they didn't need a GUI) as WebObjects or Cocoa. Problem is they don't know how they'll need to deploy it yet.

?! So it's not multi-user? Okay, I see.

cug

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Snapshot errors (3 types)
      • From: David Sargent <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: WWDC WO Meet (From: Karl Moskowski <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WWDC WO Meet (From: King Chung Huang <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WWDC WO Meet (From: Guido Neitzer <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Re: WWDC WO Meet (From: "Joe Little" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WWDC WO Meet (From: David LeBer <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WWDC WO Meet (From: William Hatch <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WWDC WO Meet (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Re: WWDC WO Meet (From: "Joe Little" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WWDC WO Meet (From: Pascal Robert <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WWDC WO Meet (From: Daniel DeCovnick <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WWDC WO Meet (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WWDC WO Meet (From: Daniel DeCovnick <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WWDC WO Meet (From: Guido Neitzer <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: ARD won't copy WebObjects application
  • Next by Date: Snapshot errors (3 types)
  • Previous by thread: Re: WWDC WO Meet
  • Next by thread: Snapshot errors (3 types)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread