• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Strange WOLips importing error (was Re: Webobjects-dev Digest, Vol 4, Issue 866)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Strange WOLips importing error (was Re: Webobjects-dev Digest, Vol 4, Issue 866)


  • Subject: Re: Strange WOLips importing error (was Re: Webobjects-dev Digest, Vol 4, Issue 866)
  • From: Lachlan Deck <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 10:34:20 +1100

Hi Ken,

your email will have more possibility of being read if you adjust the subject of your email to the same as the thread you're replying to (rather than the email digest subject) and if you trim the replied email of all the other messages.

On 26/11/2007, at 9:54 AM, Ken Foust wrote:

Ringing in:

Speaking from a novice point of view. Even though I know most of you are extremely talented not only at development but also at systems admin, you should understand that you are on a plateau that few will reach.

So if WO was buggy then at least it let someone develop something. Novices can't even load a database on Leopard let alone figuring how to make eclipse/WOLips work. Plus you tweak it everyday. Only you have the ability to keep up. So I always want to give the solution with the problem.

The nice things about WO was the tools.
So the Eclipse community should create a dmg consisting of click and run solutions.
1 replace the tools WOB, eomodeler, openbase. put it out on a dmg that works - charge money for it
then all the guru's can tweak away while the less skilled can just drag - drop and develop. When enough bugs are fixed you just release a update of the dmg. Had Apple really kept in-tune they should have updated WO over the years. A lot of high powered companies used this program and I think leaving them in the lurch was not good. So far at least WO had work arounds that let you still build a project. At least I could. I may not have been able to do everything I wanted but as long as you can get the app deployed you are at least rolling. There is no reason that the WO tools cannot be replicated as they obviously had a long life span and two or three language generations. I think if you just leave this technology to the few guru's who can do it then you will definitely continue to be on a island where you currently are. Somebody somewhere is going to replicate the WO program that works. You people are in the best position to do that and hopefully you will. If I am successful completing by database via emodeler and openbase then I will get my app deployed. And then some after that. I don't care if I have to keep a old G4 laptop and a xserver for ever. It doesn't matter if it works and makes money which is really the bottom line. There are people out there still using WO 4.5 because of the Java size and problems. Hell I am in favor of CocoaWO
and leave it on the Mac platform = the increase in macs now should ensure and proprietary platform would work if it was solid
I think opensource community is basically a closed community to anyone but guru's - So it could be great but if you continue to tweak the rest of us out then it is only a matter of time until a WO on steriods program will surface. There was a hell of a lot of money made putting Linux on a CD.


That is my two cents.

with regards, --

Lachlan Deck



_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Re: Webobjects-dev Digest, Vol 4, Issue 866 (From: Ken Foust <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: WebObjects Survey: Marketplace
  • Next by Date: Re: Duplicate Database accesses...
  • Previous by thread: Re: Webobjects-dev Digest, Vol 4, Issue 866
  • Next by thread: Re: Webobjects-dev Digest, Vol 4, Issue 866
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread