• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement?


  • Subject: Re: Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement?
  • From: Galen Rhodes <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 17:14:19 -0400

That's the problem! It IS all about personal preference. No two people write code the same way. Just as people are individuals in their preference for color, clothes, music, whatever, people have preferences for how they write code! A good number of us became very use to working with WOBuilder and, yes, even got use to it's many quirks. What's faster for one person may very well be slower for others simply because we're use to working in a different way. For some of us who were use to WOBuilder, having to use Eclipse is like going from JEdit back to using VI. And telling us to try changing the paradigm even more by switching to inline bindings is cold comfort. You may as well be telling a lifelong vegetarian to just shut up and try the veal.


-- Galen Rhodes email@hidden


On Sep 4, 2007, at 4:42 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:

- the ability to see, in a graphical way, what components are contained in other components, what they are, and (for simple things like conditionals), what their main binding is. Using WOBuilder with a complex component I can see what I need in less than a second, while it sometimes takes minutes in Eclipse to do the same thing. Although viewing tables is much easier this way, that's not the important thing. I don't need to see how the page will look-- I want to see the component hierarchy in a graphical way.
Just personal preference on this one ... I find the exact opposite. We don't do almost any table layout, and opening a complex css-laid-out component in WOBuilder appears to me to be unintelligible. Component editor in Eclipse shows both an outline view of your components as well as the collapsible HTML editor with rollovers that show the span of each tag. But this has been debated to death, so I'm leaving this at "personal preference."

- the ability to cut or copy a whole group of elements and paste them somewhere else, bindings and all.
This could definitely be added into component editor ... I can pretty easily, I think, track the associated wod bindings when you cut HTML and autocut/copy related wod entries.

ms

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40thissmallworld.com


This email sent to email@hidden

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement?
      • From: Steven Mark McCraw <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement? (From: Andrew Lindesay <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement? (From: Galen Rhodes <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement? (From: Thomas <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement? (From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement?
  • Next by Date: Re: Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement?
  • Next by thread: Re: Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread