• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Leaving WebObjects
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Leaving WebObjects


  • Subject: Re: Leaving WebObjects
  • From: Ken Anderson <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:32:20 -0400

How about  "None - it's not possible"

:)

On Apr 8, 2008, at 11:43 PM, Kieran Kelleher wrote:

So, how many would it take if the #1 music retail online commerce site was a J2EE project with J2EE devs ..... 50, 100, 150?


On Apr 8, 2008, at 6:13 PM, Alan Ward wrote:


And of course.... all the old arguments still apply. Like "how many J2EE developers (and how long) would it take to put together
an online commerce site that could become the #1 music retailer in the world?" ;-)


You may be able to find them more easily but how productive are they?

Alan

On Apr 8, 2008, at 4:06 PM, Jeff Smith wrote:

IMO, there's no excuse for somebody saying there aren't any good WO developers to hire these days. I know of several who are working on J2EE stuff that would gladly jump to a WO project if one came up. I'm more than happy to be working in WO now, I actually think it's much better now than just a few years ago. At least I feel like there's more WO going on these days (I actually got a WO call from a recruiter the other day, yikes!)

Don't give up WO because of all these reasons--do what I do and show them that WO is better for all the right reasons and make them come around. There are lots of reasons to stick with it.

On Apr 8, 2008, at 5:46 PM, Andrew Lindesay wrote:

3. Perceived lack of knowledgeable WebObjects programmers (I'm in the Chicago suburbs -- Northbrook, IL, to be precise)
...
Perhaps they've not been paying attention to the mailings lists. (specifically: webobjects-dev, wonder-disc, woproject- dev).
...
I think they meant "lack of unemployed, knowledgeable WebObjects programmers". Most (all?) of us are gainfully employed most of the time. Good WO developers are a little hard to find.

I'm having a lull at the moment if anybody wants to discuss anything... :)


cheers.

___
Andrew Lindesay
www.lindesay.co.nz

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >Leaving WebObjects (From: "Robert B. Hanviriyapunt" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Leaving WebObjects (From: Lachlan Deck <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Leaving WebObjects (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Leaving WebObjects (From: Andrew Lindesay <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Leaving WebObjects (From: Jeff Smith <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Leaving WebObjects (From: Alan Ward <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Leaving WebObjects (From: Kieran Kelleher <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Leaving WebObjects
  • Next by Date: Re: Leaving WebObjects
  • Previous by thread: Re: Leaving WebObjects
  • Next by thread: Re: Leaving WebObjects
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread