Re: ajax and webobjects
Re: ajax and webobjects
- Subject: Re: ajax and webobjects
- From: Miguel Arroz <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 17:17:00 +0100
Hi!
Clearly. This part "But then iTunes uses WebObjects (which I
believe is old school Java-based) and MobileMe uses SproutCore (which
is all dressed up in Ajax-y 2.0 objectivity)" clearly shows the author
has no idea of what he's talking about. Also, I just love this kind of
"if they used X it would have worked". I suppose that if I drive drunk
and smash my car on a tree, I should blame Peugeot. Oh well. Silly
season.
Yours
Miguel Arroz
On 2008/08/10, at 15:36, Mike Schrag wrote:
"The crazy thing is, MobileMe should have been an iTunes-learned
breeze for Apple
in terms of meeting service levels, given their pedigree. But then
iTunes uses
WebObjects (which I believe is old school Java-based) and MobileMe
uses SproutCore
(which is all dressed up in Ajax-y 2.0 objectivity), and the pretty
much disastrous
July 11th launch, which took down both iTunes iPhone activation,
and slammed the
MobileMe servers into weeks of problems, show something clearly is
different with
the new kit on the block."
This story should have a byline at the bottom "- Someone Who Doesn't
Know What He's Talking About".
ms
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
http://www.survs.com
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden