• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: ajax and webobjects
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ajax and webobjects


  • Subject: Re: ajax and webobjects
  • From: Ian Joyner <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:19:16 +1000

On 11/08/2008, at 2:17 AM, Miguel Arroz wrote:

Hi!

Clearly. This part "But then iTunes uses WebObjects (which I believe is old school Java-based) and MobileMe uses SproutCore (which is all dressed up in Ajax-y 2.0 objectivity)" clearly shows the author has no idea of what he's talking about. Also, I just love this kind of "if they used X it would have worked". I suppose that if I drive drunk and smash my car on a tree, I should blame Peugeot. Oh well. Silly season.

I knew I should have blamed Peugeot when those two people smashed into my 206 when it was less than 12 months old! Figures, WebObjects people would drive Peugeots. They can go wrong, but what is good about them is really good.


I hate this sentiment that's been around for years about "old school" to discredit existing systems which might be perfectly good. Used to be "legacy software". When someone had that on their slides or paper, caution was needed.

The MobileMe fiasco had nothing to do with technology, but I think while SJ was careful in his email not to blame anyone, it had to be some non-technical management somewhere wanting everything done at once (sounds like a company I was working for) rather than a staged roll out. I had forebodings beforehand when I heard three major things were being released all in one week. On the other hand given the enormity of releases, perhaps Apple should be praised for how well it actually went... it was a fiasco rather than a disaster.

Ian


 Yours

Miguel Arroz



On 2008/08/10, at 15:36, Mike Schrag wrote:

"The crazy thing is, MobileMe should have been an iTunes-learned breeze for Apple
in terms of meeting service levels, given their pedigree. But then iTunes uses
WebObjects (which I believe is old school Java-based) and MobileMe uses SproutCore
(which is all dressed up in Ajax-y 2.0 objectivity), and the pretty much disastrous
July 11th launch, which took down both iTunes iPhone activation, and slammed the
MobileMe servers into weeks of problems, show something clearly is different with
the new kit on the block."
This story should have a byline at the bottom "- Someone Who Doesn't Know What He's Talking About".

ms

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden

http://www.survs.com

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >ajax and webobjects (From: email@hidden)
 >Re: ajax and webobjects (From: Kieran Kelleher <email@hidden>)
 >Re: ajax and webobjects (From: "M. Blanc" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: ajax and webobjects (From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>)
 >Re: ajax and webobjects (From: Miguel Arroz <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: [OT] FrontBase problem when copying databases
  • Next by Date: Re: [OT] FrontBase problem when copying databases
  • Previous by thread: Re: ajax and webobjects
  • Next by thread: Re: ajax and webobjects
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread