• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Use of finalize methods in WO
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Use of finalize methods in WO


  • Subject: Re: Use of finalize methods in WO
  • From: David Avendasora <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:38:19 -0400


On Aug 21, 2008, at 2:16 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:

We discussed this phenomenon last night at the WO NoVA group. Consulting companies almost always get paid by the man-hour. If a project can be done in 1/10th the time with WO as it can be with another tech it is actually a disincentive for the consulting company to recommend WO because they'll make 1/10th the money off the project. That's their flawed perspective.

Or they might consider WO to the their competitive advantage.

"might" being the key word there. Anything is possible. Likely?

It is a conflict of interest for an external company to define what the best technology is for a job that they are going to develop. Period.

I don't know that I would agree with that. I'd not want to hire an external company to develop something and then mandate they use a technology that they are unfamiliar with.

I don't mean they won't pick the right thing, just that you can't assume that your best interests are what the consulting company is looking out for. The question to ask is: what does the consulting firm _think_ is in their best interest? Is it in conflict with yours?


It is in the consulting companies best interest to bill as many hours as possible without getting sued. How they go about that is very rarely also in the best interest of the customer.

If the consulting company views their best interest as keeping the customer happy and getting additional projects going forward, then it is far more likely that the tech that they choose will be the best for the customer as well. This is exceedingly rare.

We exist. I do, I really do.

I knew I should have put a little "Present company excluded" disclaimer in there... :-)


Sorry to sound so bleak, but I'd say that a majority of WO projects out there are in-house projects where a working application with a minimal amount of development time is really in _everyone's_ best interests.

That is probably true, but there are consulting companies out there (I can think of several) that make a significant portion of their money on WO work.

I don't doubt they are out there. Finding them can be a trick, and then they are usually really busy with happy customers. :-)


Dave
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Use of finalize methods in WO (From: Nilton Lessa <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Use of finalize methods in WO (From: Kieran Kelleher <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Use of finalize methods in WO (From: Simon McLean <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Use of finalize methods in WO (From: Nilton Lessa <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Use of finalize methods in WO (From: Alex Horovitz <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Use of finalize methods in WO (From: Nilton Lessa <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Use of finalize methods in WO (From: David Avendasora <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Use of finalize methods in WO (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Use of finalize methods in WO
  • Next by Date: Re: Use of finalize methods in WO
  • Previous by thread: Re: Use of finalize methods in WO
  • Next by thread: Re: Use of finalize methods in WO
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread