Re: WO Licence interpretation (again)
Re: WO Licence interpretation (again)
- Subject: Re: WO Licence interpretation (again)
- From: Pascal Robert <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 09:30:17 -0500
Le 08-12-04 à 08:48, Q a écrit :
On 04/12/2008, at 10:33 PM, Miguel Arroz wrote:
Hi!
That's not the case. You can develop on whatever platform you want
(no support from Apple for anything but OS X, as usual). You must
have an OS X license for each development machine, BUT you don't
need to use a Mac (you can keep your OS X boxes closed in a storage
room or so!). The idea is, WebObjects frameworks are part of OS X,
so you must pay OS X to develop WO. If you can do it on Linux or
Windows, it's up to you, but you still must pay Apple the
frameworks and the (ahem...) tools that are part of OS X.
Here we go again.
The license distributed with XCode 3.1 contradicts this assertion
and explicitly states:
"For avoidance of doubt, you may not distribute the WebObjects
Software on a stand-alone basis, and you may not develop application
programs using the WebObjects Software (or any portion thereof) on
any non-Apple branded computer."
This is also what we were told at WWDC. _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden