Re: Criticism of Java Persistence Frameworks Blog Post
Re: Criticism of Java Persistence Frameworks Blog Post
- Subject: Re: Criticism of Java Persistence Frameworks Blog Post
- From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 14:43:12 -0800
On Dec 5, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Guido Neitzer wrote:
On 05.12.2008, at 15:16, Chuck Hill wrote:
Well, that is one thing that people often complain about WO - there
is no current comparison to its competitors. It thought it might
be interesting to look at this this from a WO in 2008 with Wonder
perspective and see how many of his grumbles are still valid (if
they ever were).
Okay, so the interesting part is combining your knowledge combined
with an article complaining about all frameworks at the same time? ;-)
Know thy competitor. These are the people out there using JDO and
Hibernate etc. It is interesting to at least see what they perceive
as the problems.
I thought it to be pretty silly to start out with WO, than trying to
build his own persistence framework and making the stupidest mistake
ever: trying to NOT build an abstraction layer into object land but
remodeling a relational model with objects (Who in heaven would want
a "join" object?). I really thought that someone who had used EOF
should know better ...
I've met lots of people that use EOF and still don't really "get" it.
Chuck
--
Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific
problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden