• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re:eclipse key mapping [was WOLips: 80 character width gutter?]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re:eclipse key mapping [was WOLips: 80 character width gutter?]


  • Subject: Re:eclipse key mapping [was WOLips: 80 character width gutter?]
  • From: "Mr. Pierre Frisch" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:59:26 -0800

Someone had remapped eclipse funky key layout to a more Mac like layout, does anyone knows where this project is? I would really like to have eclipse be consistent with the rest of the platform.

Pierre
--
Pierre Frisch
email@hidden


On Jan 26, 2008, at 12:00, Lachlan Deck wrote:

On 27/01/2008, at 12:37 AM, Marc Guenther wrote:

Back then, one of our developers refused to use Eclipse, cause he couldn't select a method name, and then Cmd-E Cmd-G to its declaration (probably opening lots of promising looking files in the process). That was what he was used to use. While I would certainly like to have Cmd-E functionality in Eclipse (and a FindPanel which remembers what I typed into it), I prefer to simply press F3 to go to the declaration of a method. Or Ctrl-Alt-H to find from where its called. Or whatever...

Try selecting a word (even within a string) and press Cmd+k

I remember a full build used to take almost half an hour with ProjectBuilder. In Eclipse, it took 4mins, and then, when do you ever need to do a full build in Eclipse? It was quite common for a developer to break the nightly build, cause she committed a low level change which wouldn't compile in a dependant framework. Which meant half an hour coffee break for everyone the next morning.

In Eclipse, everything is always built. No manual builts, no missed compilation warnings, all dependencies magically taken care of. I am now so used to this, I wonder how any IDE could be taken seriously which doesn't provide that kind of build integration. Yet at the time, it was revolutionary.

It's funny though how you still have to do a clean build in Eclipse when things go wonky.


So revolutionary, that most in our team didn't understand it, and stuck with their, ah, this is so ugly, its one huge window, it doesn't do everything 120% as I'm used to do it, how can you stand this thing, whining.

I wonder what will happen to me if I ever have to use Xcode again :-)

Xcode 3 did look like a nice improvement :-)

with regards,
--

Lachlan Deck
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >WOLips: 80 character width gutter? (From: Gaastra Dennis - WO Lists <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WOLips: 80 character width gutter? (From: "Oswaldo Bueno" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WOLips: 80 character width gutter? (From: Thomas <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WOLips: 80 character width gutter? (From: Ian Joyner <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WOLips: 80 character width gutter? (From: Thomas <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WOLips: 80 character width gutter? (From: Art Isbell <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WOLips: 80 character width gutter? (From: Marc Guenther <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WOLips: 80 character width gutter? (From: Lachlan Deck <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: 2 WOLips Questions.
  • Next by Date: Re: 2 WOLips Questions.
  • Previous by thread: Re: WOLips: 80 character width gutter?
  • Next by thread: WOLips: Too many actions for Framework Install
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread