Re: Maven vs Ant
Re: Maven vs Ant
- Subject: Re: Maven vs Ant
- From: Pascal Robert <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:16:06 -0700
Think Pascal 4 on the Mac was really good too.
Let me tell you. You couldn't beat Turbo Pascal 4 for ease of use.
It ran off of a single floppy right out of the box. No
configuration, no downloading modules or patches. And it was FAST.
Especially compared to Microsoft's crappy development tools.
--
Galen Rhodes
email@hidden
http://www.photoyoda.com
http://www.myspace.com/woexpert
On Jun 12, 2008, at 2:35 PM, Don Lindsay wrote:
Hey! There ya go we can get Borland to help. :)
Don
On Jun 12, 2008, at 1:10 PM, Galen Rhodes wrote:
How about "WO Pascal" or, better yet, "TurboWO"!
--
Galen Rhodes
email@hidden
http://www.photoyoda.com
On Jun 12, 2008, at 12:55 PM, Don Lindsay wrote:
He,he. WebObjects Cobol! Now thats an idea. :)
Don
On Jun 11, 2008, at 7:29 PM, Galen Rhodes wrote:
Let's bring back Makefiles. That's what I learned to use back
in the 80's. I miss the 80's. Where's my Pet Shop Boys CD?
--
Galen Rhodes
email@hidden
http://www.photoyoda.com
On Jun 11, 2008, at 7:13 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jun 11, 2008, at 12:09 PM, Henrique Prange wrote:
Hi Galen,
I think it is not like WOLips vs Xcode where the latter was
deprecated
and everybody must use the former. In this case, Maven is an
alternative to Ant. In fact, you can use both if you want
(like Wonder
does). Anyway, a mechanism [1][2] to develop WO projects with
Maven is
not recent. They exist for more than a year.
You will see people telling that there is no reason to use
Maven to
build a WebObjects project (like Chuck)
I did not say there was no reason. I said that I had not
reason and could not see one. :-) I am willing to change my
mind, but I have not yet seen any compelling reason to do so.
Ant builds are bad enough.l
Chuck
and people that cannot imagine
your development lifecycle without Maven (like me). The funny
part is
that both group of people are probably right. :) You have to
identify
which tool fits best to your needs.
[1] http://wiki.objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WOL/WOProject-Maven2
[2] http://wocreator.sourceforge.net/
Cheers,
Henrique
PS.: Everything I have been writing here is based on my
observation of
the discussions and my own experience with WO and Maven. I
haven't
gone neither to WOWODC nor WWDC.
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Galen Rhodes
<email@hidden> wrote:
So, is Maven becoming the new standard for building
WebObjects instead of
Ant? From a WebObjects point of view, what advantages does
Maven have over
Ant?
--
Galen Rhodes
email@hidden
http://www.photoyoda.com
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden
)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-
email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
--
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase
their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to
solve specific problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden