Re: Better start with Wonder than WO
Re: Better start with Wonder than WO
- Subject: Re: Better start with Wonder than WO
- From: Q <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 11:27:31 +1000
On 21/03/2008, at 11:21 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Mar 20, 2008, at 5:22 PM, Andrew Lindesay wrote:
Hello Mike;
What a vigourous debate this has ensued!
examples and build entire apps using
session().defaultEditingContext().
I never really have any troubles with EC locking -- you mean when
people make a new EC and forget to lock it?
Yes. Or forget to unlock it. Or do it wrong. For most cases, they
need to be locked at the start of the RR loop and unlocked at then
end.
Autolocking is a great feature of Wonder, but honestly the base WO
frameworks really should include this feature without needing wonder
to provide it. Locking EC's should be something the developer doesn't
need to worry about unless they explicitly choose to.
--
Seeya...Q
Quinton Dolan - email@hidden
Gold Coast, QLD, Australia (GMT+10)
Ph: +61 419 729 806
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden