• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Better start with Wonder than WO
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Better start with Wonder than WO


  • Subject: Re: Better start with Wonder than WO
  • From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:33:24 -0700


On Mar 20, 2008, at 6:27 PM, Q wrote:

Yes. Or forget to unlock it. Or do it wrong. For most cases, they need to be locked at the start of the RR loop and unlocked at then end.

Autolocking is a great feature of Wonder, but honestly the base WO frameworks really should include this feature without needing wonder to provide it. Locking EC's should be something the developer doesn't need to worry about unless they explicitly choose to.


I don't think that anyone would disagree that the core frameworks _should_ do this. But they don't. And until they do...


Chuck



--

Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects






_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Better start with Wonder than WO (From: Gustavo Pizano <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Better start with Wonder than WO (From: David LeBer <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Better start with Wonder than WO (From: Gustavo Pizano <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Better start with Wonder than WO (From: David LeBer <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Better start with Wonder than WO (From: "Mr. Pierre Frisch" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Better start with Wonder than WO (From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Better start with Wonder than WO (From: Andrew Lindesay <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Better start with Wonder than WO (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Better start with Wonder than WO (From: Q <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Better start with Wonder than WO
  • Next by Date: Re: Better start with Wonder than WO
  • Previous by thread: Re: Better start with Wonder than WO
  • Next by thread: Re: Better start with Wonder than WO
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread