• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Better start with Wonder than WO
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Better start with Wonder than WO


  • Subject: Re: Better start with Wonder than WO
  • From: Oliver Scheel <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 21:47:47 +0100
  • Thread-topic: Better start with Wonder than WO

And I have switched a WO 5.2.4 plain app now to WO 5.3 + Wonder and it feels
much "slickier". With WO 5.2.4 you have to cope with framwork quirks and now
they are almost gone (look mom, no hacks anymore;-)).

Wonder in the early days was an all or nothing thing, but with 3.0 it was
"fixed" ;-)

Oliver

P.S.: And I only use ERExtensions/Jars (no prototypes, no Wonder EO
tempates, no ERXKeys, no wognl (yet ;-)).

> Von: Archibald Singleton <email@hidden>
> Datum: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:20:06 -0300
> An: AppleWO List <email@hidden>
> Betreff: Re: Better start with Wonder than WO
>
> +1
>
> I've tried the newbie path both w/ and w/o Wonder. Based on my
> experience, I definitely recommend using WOnder.
>
> My experience is that WOnder didn't add much complexity to the
> learning curve.
>
> *On the contrary*, I think it makes things simpler (while making some
> of the broken stuff Just Work (tm) too).
> Truth is, it does requires more *work* since you need to learn more,
> but it's worth it.
>
> Also for now, I'd also suggest sticking with WO 5.3.x instead of WO
> 5.4.x.
>
> = tmk =
>
> On 20 Mar 2008, at 17:28, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
>> Like, for example, you are using WebObjects?
>
> [snip]
>
>> On Mar 20, 2008, at 1:20 PM, Mr. Pierre Frisch wrote:
>>
>>> I would totally disagree with that. Wonder introduce another layer
>>> of complexity and patching on top of WO. I think you should only
>>> use Wonder if you have a good reason for it.
>>>
>>> Pierre
>>> --
>>> Pierre Frisch
>>> email@hidden
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mar 20, 2008, at 11:56, David LeBer wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>>> For a new WO developer, I think there are amazing benefits for
>>> starting with Wonder.
>
>  _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Re: Better start with Wonder than WO (From: Archibald Singleton <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Better start with Wonder than WO
  • Next by Date: Re: Help with this db design
  • Previous by thread: Re: Better start with Wonder than WO
  • Next by thread: Re: Better start with Wonder than WO
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread