Re: Better start with Wonder than WO
Re: Better start with Wonder than WO
- Subject: Re: Better start with Wonder than WO
- From: Archibald Singleton <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:20:06 -0300
+1
I've tried the newbie path both w/ and w/o Wonder. Based on my
experience, I definitely recommend using WOnder.
My experience is that WOnder didn't add much complexity to the
learning curve.
*On the contrary*, I think it makes things simpler (while making some
of the broken stuff Just Work (tm) too).
Truth is, it does requires more *work* since you need to learn more,
but it's worth it.
Also for now, I'd also suggest sticking with WO 5.3.x instead of WO
5.4.x.
= tmk =
On 20 Mar 2008, at 17:28, Chuck Hill wrote:
Like, for example, you are using WebObjects?
[snip]
On Mar 20, 2008, at 1:20 PM, Mr. Pierre Frisch wrote:
I would totally disagree with that. Wonder introduce another layer
of complexity and patching on top of WO. I think you should only
use Wonder if you have a good reason for it.
Pierre
--
Pierre Frisch
email@hidden
On Mar 20, 2008, at 11:56, David LeBer wrote:
[snip]
For a new WO developer, I think there are amazing benefits for
starting with Wonder.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden