Re: Better start with Wonder than WO
Re: Better start with Wonder than WO
- Subject: Re: Better start with Wonder than WO
- From: Archibald Singleton <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 11:53:23 -0300
On 21 Mar 2008, at 17:20, Archibald Singleton wrote:
+1
I've tried the newbie path both w/ and w/o Wonder. Based on my
experience, I definitely recommend using WOnder.
My experience is that WOnder didn't add much complexity to the
learning curve.
*On the contrary*, I think it makes things simpler (while making
some of the broken stuff Just Work (tm) too).
Truth is, it does requires more *work* since you need to learn more,
but it's worth it.
Thinking more about it, I realize that I didn't factor in all the work
that WOnder *saves* you (e.g. using the Ajax framework, ERXQ and
ERXKeys are just a few examples that come to mind), so I'd actually
venture to say that using WOnder is actually less work overall.
= tmk =
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden