Re: maven.
Re: maven.
- Subject: Re: maven.
- From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 19:26:46 -0400
people to extend the javadoc. I considered also making it so a
doclet would pull that content into the real javadoc at build time,
but Chuck mentioned that Sun provide doclets in 1.5? I'm still not
convinced I believe him, though :)
Well, when I said that I used real English sentences. ;-) And what
I said was that Sun is changing the API and so made it private in
1.5 thus preventing any custom doclets being generated.
Wow. When I typed that my brain said "broke" ... fingers typed
"provide" In my defense I had a 3 yr old saying
"daddy.daddy.daddy.daddy." while typing it. It's sort of amazing I
didn't type "murder" instead.
"Sun implemented a lock-out in the doclet toolkit API to prevent
others from using it The idea was to develop the toolkit further to
finalize it and then remove the lock and make the API public. It's
unknown when or if Sun would remove this lock. Both the Standard and
MIF doclets use the doclet toolkit."
Wonder has those @binding things that show up in javadoc -- how do
those work?
ms
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden