Re: Escaping in strings according to WOML
Re: Escaping in strings according to WOML
- Subject: Re: Escaping in strings according to WOML
- From: Anjo Krank <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:38:02 +0200
Am 30.06.2009 um 19:58 schrieb Pascal Robert:
Le 09-06-30 à 13:53, Mike Schrag a écrit :
"Even Apple have dodgy bits of PHP bolted on to their web site.http://is.gd/1i8tH
Still, got to be better than WebObjects, right?"
I find that kind of comments at least 3 times per week :-/
Most of the people on twitter don't even know what apps are and
aren't WebObjects (nor what WebObjects even IS, for that
matter) ... Go do a search -- they bitch about the iPhone developer
forum, for instance, which is JSP/Servlet.
I think most of them blame WO for everything just because of either
the URLs (I saw a couple of stupid comments about how "bad", in
their opinion, WO URLs are) or because the Apple Online Store is
down when they release new or updated stuff... But it's funny to see
RoR/PHP people blame WO for scabality but Twitter generate timeouts
or "overlead" messages everyday and they just have to deal with 140
chars message :-) Imagine if they had to deal with the same size of
content as iTunes...
What makes you think they don't? They most probably got more users,
more concurrent requests and more shared content (between users).
Which takes them to a range of problems that I'm not sure are fun to
do with WO. WO is really cool with creating really complex
interactioning, user-owns-data, lotsa-editing type apps. For a lot of
other things, it probably creates at least as much problems than it
solves...
Cheers, Anjo _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden