Re: Getters without the "get" part
Re: Getters without the "get" part
- Subject: Re: Getters without the "get" part
- From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:38:29 -0400
I mostly agree (without really understanding idempotent, homonym,
mutator or clarity).
Actually, I'd vote for a WO release that added "get" to all
methods and provided no compatibility deprecation at all.
Cheers, Anjo
Officially the last thing I expected to hear.
My eyebrows found new heights :-) esp given all the 'this is the
last WO54 compatibility...' messages over the last so often + I seem
to recall the words never and ever being used with regards to this
topic in the past.
But perhaps Anjo is being facetious given the WO54 api breakages and
the flow-on consequences of such a change to WO.
Notice it doesn't say he'd USE such a wo release, just that he'd be
all for it ... He'd probably be all for renaming every method in WO to
"abc".
ms
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden