Re: Getters without the "get" part
Re: Getters without the "get" part
- Subject: Re: Getters without the "get" part
- From: Lachlan Deck <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 14:55:12 +1100
On 01/04/2009, at 2:26 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Mar 31, 2009, at 8:21 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
On 01/04/2009, at 6:29 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
WO/EOF moving to straight List/Map/Set would suffer from a loss in
clarity as a result. On the flip side, it would gain the
performance and flexibility of the Java collections APIs, which is
a win. I'm definitely conflicted on the correct answer to this
conundrum.
As long as KVC options remain I guess I don't mind if they go the
way of the dodo. But I much prefer the clarity of setObjectForKey
than put etc.
Good Lord! I think we agree! :-P
And WOidites enjoyed a time of peace...
with regards,
--
Lachlan Deck
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden