Re: Getters without the "get" part
Re: Getters without the "get" part
- Subject: Re: Getters without the "get" part
- From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 00:59:38 -0400
This already should have happened. Once you get a firm grasp of
the Java Collections API, it's design, intention and power,
NSArray and it's company will make you want to puke. I actually
thought that WO would move in this direction by first making
NSArray implement List, and do all the similar stuff, then
depreciate Foundation collections, and the finally get rid of
them. Well, maybe that still is the intention, but it sure is slow.
The lack of power sucks,
Can you elaborate on the lack of power?
Lack of power = I wanted LinkdHashMap, ConcurrentHashMap, LinkedList
vs ArrayList, TreeMap, WeakHashMap ... So many other options. The NS
collections are fundamentally flawed that they are concrete.
Things I love (not) about standard collections: can't instantiate
the silly things with objects. No nsarray kvc ops...
Yep ...
ms
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden