Re: Snow Leopard Development and Deployment
Re: Snow Leopard Development and Deployment
- Subject: Re: Snow Leopard Development and Deployment
- From: Tim Worman <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 11:25:46 -0700
On Sep 1, 2009, at 6:18 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
When it says "is not supported" that means just that. WO shouldn't
be used on 10.6... You can try at your own risk, but things like
software updates and such aren't going to be tested against
breaking it. The blurb about being able to use 10.6 to remotely
manage a 10.4 or 10.5 server implies that keeping one of those
around is the intended configuration.
In the same sense that if you install Wordpress on your server, it's
"not supported" and Apple hasn't "tested against breaking it," but
it works just fine. WO is just a Java app -- it works perfectly fine
on Snow Leopard.
ms
That makes perfect sense to me as a WO developer but don't you think
the language is pretty strong and a little alarming? I kind of feel
like it is considering that WebObjects is an Apple product and a core
piece of their own business architecture. It is obviously heavily
tested by experience alone on their own systems. Such a statement
about a 3rd party package like WordPress wouldn't seem nearly as a
aggressive.
Tim
UCLA GSE&IS
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden