Re: Snow Leopard Development and Deployment
Re: Snow Leopard Development and Deployment
- Subject: Re: Snow Leopard Development and Deployment
- From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 18:56:12 -0400
On Sep 1, 2009, at 2:25 PM, Tim Worman wrote:
On Sep 1, 2009, at 6:18 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
When it says "is not supported" that means just that. WO
shouldn't be used on 10.6... You can try at your own risk, but
things like software updates and such aren't going to be tested
against breaking it. The blurb about being able to use 10.6 to
remotely manage a 10.4 or 10.5 server implies that keeping one of
those around is the intended configuration.
In the same sense that if you install Wordpress on your server,
it's "not supported" and Apple hasn't "tested against breaking it,"
but it works just fine. WO is just a Java app -- it works perfectly
fine on Snow Leopard.
ms
That makes perfect sense to me as a WO developer but don't you think
the language is pretty strong and a little alarming? I kind of feel
like it is considering that WebObjects is an Apple product and a
core piece of their own business architecture. It is obviously
heavily tested by experience alone on their own systems. Such a
statement about a 3rd party package like WordPress wouldn't seem
nearly as a aggressive.
The ways of Apple are many and mysterious. The ways of Apple Legal
and Apple Marketing are downright bizarre. Don't look for secret
messages in the Apple pronouncements, there aren't any.
Chuck
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden