Re: Modeling an optional to-one relationship
Re: Modeling an optional to-one relationship
- Subject: Re: Modeling an optional to-one relationship
- From: Mark Ritchie <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:14:10 -0800
On 15/Jan/2010, at 10:52 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
> I wonder if we are mis-communicating. What are you describing below seems to be the default behavior if NOT using the delegate method from Kelly Hawk. Is this below result from the code you posted later (Application.java)?
Oh yes, I should have been more clear.
My example is using the default 5.4.3 behaviour.
Kelly's code is not loaded. Thanks btw to the pointer to it in Wonder.
As usual, I was lost because I neglected to properly mangle the name! ;-)
M.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden