Re: Modeling an optional to-one relationship
Re: Modeling an optional to-one relationship
- Subject: Re: Modeling an optional to-one relationship
- From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:17:52 -0800
On Jan 15, 2010, at 11:14 AM, Mark Ritchie wrote:
On 15/Jan/2010, at 10:52 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
I wonder if we are mis-communicating. What are you describing
below seems to be the default behavior if NOT using the delegate
method from Kelly Hawk. Is this below result from the code you
posted later (Application.java)?
Oh yes, I should have been more clear.
My example is using the default 5.4.3 behaviour.
OK, good. What you are describing is also what I expect the default
5.4.3 behaviour to be. We are all good here. :-)
Chuck
Kelly's code is not loaded. Thanks btw to the pointer to it in
Wonder.
As usual, I was lost because I neglected to properly mangle the
name! ;-)
M.
--
Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific
problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden