Re: Modeling an optional to-one relationship
Re: Modeling an optional to-one relationship
- Subject: Re: Modeling an optional to-one relationship
- From: Mark Ritchie <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:19:56 -0800
On 15/Jan/2010, at 11:17 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
> OK, good. What you are describing is also what I expect the default 5.4.3 behaviour to be. We are all good here. :-)
Ah ok, sorry about bending your head on that one... ;-) However, always nice to have our idea of reality shaken from time to time... As a opportunity for a sanity check! ;-)
M.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden