Re: SVN and Eclipse
Re: SVN and Eclipse
- Subject: Re: SVN and Eclipse
- From: Mark Ritchie <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:46:31 -0700
Hey!
On 30/Jul/2010, at 7:34 AM, Farrukh Ijaz wrote:
> On 30-Jul-2010, at 3:57 PM, Valerio Luccio <email@hidden> wrote:
>> Farrukh Ijaz wrote:
>>> At first place I would avoid svning the tar as it is a binary file and even a minor change will change the binary and I guess every time the commit will recognize it as new file will commit the whole tar instead of differences, as a result it will start eating repository disk space very fast. I see plan C would be the best choice iff you can switch to hudson. Otherwise instead storing the tar, tag the successful revision.
>>> Farrukh
>> True, but I don't create tarballs that often and it's only 1.1 MB, storage space is not an issue. I guess they could check out the code from dist just as well, I'm not sure why I went down the tarball route ...
> Then go for plan B. Have a separate folder under your project and either generate the tar in it or move from dist to it.
Um, SVN stores differences in binary files and not the whole file each time!
Thank the gods that we're no longer following the RCS/CVS plan! ;-) See:
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.forcvs.binary-and-trans.html
Wrt how to achieve your original goal, I would go with Chuck's solution and copy each new tar ball to a new folder! ;-)
Good Luck!
M.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden