Re: Scala and WebObjects
Re: Scala and WebObjects
- Subject: Re: Scala and WebObjects
- From: David LeBer <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 13:58:50 -0500
On 2010-11-12, at 1:33 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
> On Nov 12, 2010, at 4:50 AM, Hugi Thordarson wrote:
>>
>> I honestly don't see what Apple gains by forbidding me and my coworkers to use WO.
>
> The question at this point is what would they gain by allowing it?
Does Apple really care? Yes I know that clause is in the license. But does anyone really think that Apple would expend the effort to come after someone who decided to develop WO on a generic linux box instead of a Mac?
My sense is that we are so far outside their worldview that we don't even rate the effort.
And as preemptive 'yes I understand that' statement: I do understand that the fact that the clause is there is all it takes as a deterrent for some, and I am not passing judgement.
;david
--
David LeBer
Codeferous Software
'co-def-er-ous' adj. Literally 'code-bearing'
site: http://codeferous.com
blog: http://davidleber.net
profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidleber
twitter: http://twitter.com/rebeld
--
Toronto Area Cocoa / WebObjects developers group:
http://tacow.org
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden