Re: Scala and WebObjects
Re: Scala and WebObjects
- Subject: Re: Scala and WebObjects
- From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:05:15 -0800
On Nov 11, 2010, at 5:08 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
> Le 2010-11-11 à 19:12, Chuck Hill a écrit :
>> On Nov 11, 2010, at 4:05 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:
>>
>>> I have a question that I kept to myself for months, but let's go public. People talks about moving away from WO or even writing WO/EOF replacements. But AFAIK, Wonder shows that we can extend the core frameworks a lot. Sure, extending WO so that EOF become multi-threaded or anything like this would be a huge task, but from my point of view (a non-technical one), we can do a lot on top of WO to "fix" problems. And to me, it make more sense to extend WO than trying to rewrite it...
>>
>> Was there a question in there?
>
> The question is more that I don't understand why people wants to rewrite WO when you can simply extend it. To me, it's just like the Linux people who keeps rewriting stuff instead of improving it. It's incredible the number of stuff on FreshMeat that do almost the same thing and that could be done in one or two applications instead of dozens of them.
I don't know that I want to re-write it, but there are bug fixes and enhancements to EOF that I would like that can't easily be done in Wonder.
Chuck
--
Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden