Re: Scala and WebObjects
Re: Scala and WebObjects
- Subject: Re: Scala and WebObjects
- From: Pascal Robert <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 15:13:40 -0500
Le 2010-11-12 à 15:05, Chuck Hill a écrit :
> On Nov 11, 2010, at 5:08 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
>> Le 2010-11-11 à 19:12, Chuck Hill a écrit :
>>> On Nov 11, 2010, at 4:05 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have a question that I kept to myself for months, but let's go public. People talks about moving away from WO or even writing WO/EOF replacements. But AFAIK, Wonder shows that we can extend the core frameworks a lot. Sure, extending WO so that EOF become multi-threaded or anything like this would be a huge task, but from my point of view (a non-technical one), we can do a lot on top of WO to "fix" problems. And to me, it make more sense to extend WO than trying to rewrite it...
>>>
>>> Was there a question in there?
>>
>> The question is more that I don't understand why people wants to rewrite WO when you can simply extend it. To me, it's just like the Linux people who keeps rewriting stuff instead of improving it. It's incredible the number of stuff on FreshMeat that do almost the same thing and that could be done in one or two applications instead of dozens of them.
>
>
> I don't know that I want to re-write it, but there are bug fixes and enhancements to EOF that I would like that can't easily be done in Wonder.
That's because you don't have time for bug fixes now that you tweet :
http://twitter.com/chillgvc/status/3174522576445440 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden