Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: darwinports v fink

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: darwinports v fink

Subject: Re: darwinports v fink
From: robert delius royar <email@hidden>
Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 11:34:18 -0400 (EDT)
Organization: An Apple OS X end user
Priority: normal

Sat, 7 May 2005 (16:07 +0100 UTC) Lawrence Paulson wrote:

Fink's version of XEmacs doesn't seem to build under Tiger on my G5. Is DarwinPorts a better way to get XEmacs and Emacs? Is it possible to use both Fink and DarwinPorts on the same computer, or is this asking for library conflicts, etc.?

Larry Paulson

I build 21.5.b20 regularly from cvs. I discovered on Tiger I must not use any explicit optimization, not even -Os. I have seen other ported applications that break the same way under Tiger or gcc4.0.

Perhaps a minor change to the compiler flags would fix the fink build (if that is user configurable).

--
Dr. Robert Delius Royar                   Associate Professor of English
Morehead State University                             Morehead, Kentucky
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
X11-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
This email sent to email@hidden


Follow-Ups:

Re: darwinports v fink
From: Martin Costabel <email@hidden>
Re: darwinports v fink-- what about optimization in general?
From: Ronald Cohen <email@hidden>


References:  
  >darwinports v fink (From: Lawrence Paulson <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
darwinports v fink

Next by Date:
Re: darwinports v fink-- what about optimization in general?

Previous by thread:
darwinports v fink

Next by thread:
Re: darwinports v fink-- what about optimization in general?

Index(es):

Date
Thread