• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: A proposal for the keybindings issue
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A proposal for the keybindings issue


  • Subject: Re: A proposal for the keybindings issue
  • From: Merton Campbell Crockett <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 13:01:53 -0800


On 25 Nov 2007, at 08:24:21, Andrew J. Hesford wrote:

On Nov 25, 2007, at 9:55 AM, Merton Campbell Crockett wrote:

There are good reasons not to allow focus-follows-mouse, particularly when you have a system-wide menu bar. Obviously, having an application steal focus on the way to the menu would be a bad thing! However, I will grant you that the Openbox window manager has a focusing delay, which makes the system wait a configurable time before giving focus to a window. This would solve the menu problem.

The window manager wm2 (which I've never used for more than 10 minutes) has a little manifesto on the main page (http://www.all-day-breakfast.com/wm2 ). Point 4 of this manifesto: "The click-to-focus versus focus- follows-pointer war is not really important. Most people can get used to either." While I used to disagree with the statement, my time with the Macintosh has convinced me that he is right. You get used to either, and it doesn't make much difference. Move then click, or just move... it doesn't amount to much difference in time.


Whether it's the result of me getting older or using other systems with different behaviors all day long, I still haven't gotten use to the "click to focus" approach of Mac OS X. I'm use to the "focus follows mouse" and "click to raise" approach and still get caught by operations being done to the "wrong" window.

Perhaps its time for me to eliminate these differences by retiring. Changes in Federal regulations on how the value of lump-sum distributions in retirement plans are calculated may accelerate my retirement plans but what would I do with myself. :(


Merton Campbell Crockett email@hidden



_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
X11-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Re: A proposal for the keybindings issue (From: "Nathaniel Gray" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: A proposal for the keybindings issue (From: Harald Hanche-Olsen <email@hidden>)
 >Re: A proposal for the keybindings issue (From: Merton Campbell Crockett <email@hidden>)
 >Re: A proposal for the keybindings issue (From: Harald Hanche-Olsen <email@hidden>)
 >Re: A proposal for the keybindings issue (From: Merton Campbell Crockett <email@hidden>)
 >Re: A proposal for the keybindings issue (From: "Andrew J. Hesford" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: A proposal for the keybindings issue (From: Merton Campbell Crockett <email@hidden>)
 >Re: A proposal for the keybindings issue (From: "Andrew J. Hesford" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Security concerns (Was Re: XQuartz quextion)
  • Next by Date: Re: Security concerns (Was Re: XQuartz quextion)
  • Previous by thread: Re: A proposal for the keybindings issue
  • Next by thread: Re: A proposal for the keybindings issue
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread