Re: two annoyances with X11
Re: two annoyances with X11
- Subject: Re: two annoyances with X11
- From: Jeremy Huddleston <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 10:00:36 -0800
On Nov 23, 2011, at 6:22 AM, Jamie Kennea wrote:
>
> On Nov 22, 2011, at 10:05 PM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
>
>> I was under the impression it matched SL... oh well. The way the shadows were done changed in SL from the way it was done in Tiger and Leopard (using real APIs rather than doing it ourselves), so there should be "some" difference. It's unfortunate that it doesn't match, but meh.
>
> A very un-Apple like response! :D
Really? How so? X11 is 25 year old technology and was never intended for this sort of configuration. You're quite lucky it works at all on OS X and really have some legendary hackers to thank for that. When X11 was originally ported to OS X, they didn't have extensions like damage or composite to work with. What they came up with was actually quite good considering what they had to work with at the time.
>> Well then you're the first to complain about it, and there is no bug report yet, ... care to make one?
>
> Hmm... I thought I had put one in a while back in the Leopard days...
I only see 3 radars filed by you. The one you just did for X11 and two for Dock (minimizing windows to the X11 app icon and keypresses getting stuck when entering Exposé/Spaces). Do you have a radar number for the original one?
> OK, I'll submit one to radar today.
In the future, you can also submit it to trac for increased visibility:
http://xquartz.macosforge.org
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
X11-users mailing list (email@hidden)
This email sent to email@hidden