Re: CW to Xcode transition - Is more RAM worthwhile?
Re: CW to Xcode transition - Is more RAM worthwhile?
- Subject: Re: CW to Xcode transition - Is more RAM worthwhile?
- From: "Sean McBride" <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:39:46 -0500
- Organization: Rogue Research
On 2005-12-21 15:34, Markus Hitter said:
>> With Xcode 2.2 on my 2.5 GHz dual G5 it took 1:23 for a complete
>> debug build
>
>C++ is a very complex language ...
Irrelevant.
>> ... and with CW it took 34 seconds.
>
>This one lacks other features, like e.g. ObjC compatibility,
>fix&continue, ...
What are you talking about? CodeWarrior has supported Objective-C for
many years, and I use it to build Cocoa applications with no problems.
(However, it does not support the new @synchronize stuff added to the
language recently.) Have you actually used CW?
My biggest Cocoa project is not very big, but takes 15 seconds to build
in CW, and 30 in Xcode, so this is nothing to do with C++ being complex.
Each IDE has its pros and cons, but please... CW is faster than Xcode is
almost every respect. CW sucks in plenty of other ways, but give credit
where credit is due Markus.
--
____________________________________________________________
Sean McBride, B. Eng email@hidden
Rogue Research www.rogue-research.com
Mac Software Developer Montréal, Québec, Canada
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden