• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: prebinding? (was re: XCode 2.0 broken?)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: prebinding? (was re: XCode 2.0 broken?)


  • Subject: Re: prebinding? (was re: XCode 2.0 broken?)
  • From: j o a r <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 16:30:13 +0200


On 25 maj 2005, at 16.18, Mike Pinkerton wrote:

My brain knows this to be true, but if that's the case, why do we still
have to suffer through the "optimizing system" phase on every software
update? People ask me all the time and I have no good answer...

At WWDC last year we were told that while the performance gap between a prebound app and an non-prebound app is smaller, there is still a difference, and as long as there is a difference Apple might choose to take advantage of it. That's not an exact quote, but it was something to that effect...


Besides, isn't the "optimizing" phase much, much, faster on Tiger? Almost to the point of not being a problem?

j o a r


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >prebinding? (was re: XCode 2.0 broken?) (From: "Mike Pinkerton" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: prebinding? (was re: XCode 2.0 broken?)
  • Next by Date: Re: Subversion (Partly Solved)
  • Previous by thread: prebinding? (was re: XCode 2.0 broken?)
  • Next by thread: Re: prebinding? (was re: XCode 2.0 broken?)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread