Lists

Open Menu Close Menu

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: prebinding? (was re: XCode 2.0 broken?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: prebinding? (was re: XCode 2.0 broken?)

Subject: Re: prebinding? (was re: XCode 2.0 broken?)
From: Chris Espinosa <email@hidden>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 07:51:16 -0700

On May 25, 2005, at 7:18 AM, Mike Pinkerton wrote:

email@hidden wrote on 5/20/05, 1:33 PM:

dyld was optimized to make prebinding unnecessary starting in 10.3.4.

My brain knows this to be true, but if that's the case, why do we still

have to suffer through the "optimizing system" phase on every software

update? People ask me all the time and I have no good answer...

Applications do not have to be prebound to launch quickly (though some may still benefit from it). Frameworks do still benefit from prebinding, so the Optimizing step re-prebinds system frameworks. These are easier to search for and there are few of them, so the step (while it still exists) is much faster, and still beneficial.

Chris

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References:
	>prebinding? (was re: XCode 2.0 broken?) (From: "Mike Pinkerton" <email@hidden>)

Prev by Date: Re: Subversion (Partly Solved)
Next by Date: NSInvalidArgumentException again
Previous by thread: Re: prebinding? (was re: XCode 2.0 broken?)
Next by thread: NSInvalidArgumentException again
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread