• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: -O3 vs. -Os
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: -O3 vs. -Os


  • Subject: Re: -O3 vs. -Os
  • From: Rustam Muginov <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 15:55:20 +0300

On Jan 17, 2006, at 3:49 PM, Rustam Muginov wrote:

If you do have some math-intensive code, for example, where is a "threshhold" - then this chunk of code grown large enough to not fit to stack, performance drops drammaticaly. So _generaly_, its prefered to minimize code size.


Correction: "to not to fit to cache", not "to stack"

--
Sincerely,
	Rustam Muginov

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >-O3 vs. -Os (From: Steve Checkoway <email@hidden>)
 >Re: -O3 vs. -Os (From: Rustam Muginov <email@hidden>)
 >Re: -O3 vs. -Os (From: Steve Checkoway <email@hidden>)
 >Re: -O3 vs. -Os (From: Rustam Muginov <email@hidden>)
 >Re: -O3 vs. -Os (From: Steve Checkoway <email@hidden>)
 >Re: -O3 vs. -Os (From: Rustam Muginov <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: -O3 vs. -Os
  • Next by Date: Deploying Mac Software.
  • Previous by thread: Re: -O3 vs. -Os
  • Next by thread: Re: -O3 vs. -Os
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread