Re: Static-linking a framework?
Re: Static-linking a framework?
- Subject: Re: Static-linking a framework?
- From: "Sean McBride" <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 19:49:36 -0500
- Organization: Rogue Research
On 3/6/08 12:37 AM, Uli Kusterer said:
> So, in the end I filed a bug, and I'm hoping Apple will implement
>support in Xcode for automatically scanned header and resource folders
>at least, or even full-blown static frameworks.
I too would like this. The nice thing about static linking is that the
linker can do dead code stripping. I have a static lib (.a) that is
about 250 MB but I don't use anywhere near all of it. My actual app is
only 20 MB, it would be 270 if I embedded a framework version!
--
____________________________________________________________
Sean McBride, B. Eng email@hidden
Rogue Research www.rogue-research.com
Mac Software Developer Montréal, Québec, Canada
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden