Re: "Future" of llvm-gcc with regards to support
Re: "Future" of llvm-gcc with regards to support
- Subject: Re: "Future" of llvm-gcc with regards to support
- From: Joar Wingfors <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:10:58 -0800
Please file a bug report.
(Are you sure that you're invoking the correct copy of clang when you're getting the version on the command line?)
Joar
On 27 feb 2012, at 12:05, Brad Oliver wrote:
> On Feb 24, 2012, at 4:29 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote:
>
>> llvm-gcc is obsolete and has been deprecated in the LLVM 3.0 release (using the official LLVM versioning, not the fancy Apple one).
>
> OK, fair enough. Can someone explain to me the Clang versioning?
>
> * Taking Xcode 4.3 as an example, I see that it reports "Apple LLVM Compiler 3.1" as the default compiler.
>
> * I see warning messages in the build from "LLVM 1.0"
>
> * Running clang -v on the commandline gives me "Clang version 3.0 (based on LLVM 3.0svn).
>
> *head explodes*
>
> --
> Brad Oliver
> email@hidden
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden