• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: "Future" of llvm-gcc with regards to support
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: "Future" of llvm-gcc with regards to support


  • Subject: Re: "Future" of llvm-gcc with regards to support
  • From: Jean-Daniel Dupas <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:03:05 +0100

Le 28 févr. 2012 à 07:31, Brad Oliver a écrit :

> I'd file a bug report, but I'm not exactly sure what I'd file it on. "Make Clang versioning consistent" ?
>
> Anyway, I just double-checked and Xcode 4.3 says the command-line tools were not installed. I could swear I did that immediately after installing Xcode 4.3 last week, but perhaps that only happened in a dream.
>
> So after installing that, I get the expected "Apple clang version 3.1 (tags/Apple/clang-318.0.45) (based on LLVM 3.1svn)". My world makes a little more sense now, although I forgot to mention another versioning inconsistency:
>
> GCC_VERSION is com.apple.compilers.llvm.clang.1_0 (again with the 1.0!)

Don't expect this one to change anytime soon. Changing it would break all projects using this build setting (and xcconfig files).
That's also why Xcode keeps using c++0x in the build settings while it expands to -std=c++11 in recent versions.

-- Jean-Daniel





 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: "Future" of llvm-gcc with regards to support
      • From: Brad Oliver <email@hidden>
References: 
 >"Future" of llvm-gcc with regards to support (From: Brad Oliver <email@hidden>)
 >Re: "Future" of llvm-gcc with regards to support (From: Jean-Daniel Dupas <email@hidden>)
 >Re: "Future" of llvm-gcc with regards to support (From: Brad Oliver <email@hidden>)
 >Re: "Future" of llvm-gcc with regards to support (From: Joar Wingfors <email@hidden>)
 >Re: "Future" of llvm-gcc with regards to support (From: Brad Oliver <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: SVN crash
  • Next by Date: Re: "Future" of llvm-gcc with regards to support
  • Previous by thread: Re: "Future" of llvm-gcc with regards to support
  • Next by thread: Re: "Future" of llvm-gcc with regards to support
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread