Re: Xquartz version change?
Re: Xquartz version change?
- Subject: Re: Xquartz version change?
- From: Jeremy Huddleston <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 11:33:22 -0800
On Dec 8, 2007, at 08:09, Robert T Wyatt wrote:
Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
Honestly, this problem comes from years of fink having to use ugly
grep hacks to figure out version numbers for X11, and there is
finally a *real* way for them to check it now. It's sad that they
did not get this working right during the Leopard beta, but I'm
confident that it will be working soon.
Hi Jeremy,
Thanks for all your hard work! I'm sure the fink core developers
will have a fix for this pretty soon, but I don't understand how it
could have been fixed during the beta process when it only cropped
up a week ago...? Anyhow, you're right that the new way is the way
of the future. --rtw
It could've been fixed if they handled it "correctly" and didn't rely
on that version number from Xquartz -version. As it is, they just
added to their perl regex to check for the new X.org Release string.
I'll have a fink-happy (hopefully) binary up in a few.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
X11-users mailing list (email@hidden)
This email sent to email@hidden