• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Cocoa vs User: 0 - 1
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Cocoa vs User: 0 - 1


  • Subject: Re: Cocoa vs User: 0 - 1
  • From: Ondra Cada <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 15:02:28 +0200

On 17.4.2004, at 14:34, Rosyna wrote:

>> Seems to me it is a bug in the user, so to speak, who tries to do
>> things so ugly he should not be surprised. Next time someone tries to
>> delete a running application?
>
> But why? It shouldn't ever have caused a problem. And the Finder
> prevents you from deleting an application that in use. Never to fond
> of people suggesting that a feature get removed to fix a bug or
> prevent some security issue.

Definitely. "Feature" here baing the possibility to delete an open or
running file, the lack of which is one of the worst Windoze problems.

Agreed that on the Finder level (and *NOT* below) there *possibly*
should be a warning "This is an open document / a running application,
if you really want to move/copy/delete it, the result can be
disastrous".

Nevertheless, it should be *very carefully considered* not to make the
result as safe as unusable. Take a remotely similar case of draggin'
the document icon from the window title: the code tries to be smart,
not allowing you to drag the icon from an unsaved document. It is the
second worst decision from the moment Apple moved scrollbars to the
wrong side of the scrollview -- umpteen times a day I would need to get
the *saved version of the document* to copy it somewhere and/or check
it contents, and am losing precious time by having to use Finder or
Terminal instead of simply dragging its icon to do so.

>> From the more practical point of view it again supports my old rant
>> that all the application should be in the admin space, and all users
>> should *always* work in non-admin accounts.
>
> So users feel that need to be admin to get any work done?

Again, definitely. During the course of becoming admins they would
learn that some things are not done (and why).

Anyway, I suggest we end this thread, for it is definitely OT: we won't
learn anything of Cocoa, and we won't be able to change Apple policy
anyway, even if we happen to agree it is desirable.
---
Ondra Hada
OCSoftware: email@hidden http://www.ocs.cz
private email@hidden http://www.ocs.cz/oc

[demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/pkcs7-signature which had a name of smime.p7s]
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Cocoa vs User: 0 - 1
      • From: Charles Srstka <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Cocoa vs User: 0 - 1 (From: Stéphane Sudre <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Cocoa vs User: 0 - 1 (From: Ondra Cada <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Cocoa vs User: 0 - 1 (From: Rosyna <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Unique problem with Tool Tips of a Window and Sheet
  • Next by Date: Application Icon
  • Previous by thread: Re: Cocoa vs User: 0 - 1
  • Next by thread: Re: Cocoa vs User: 0 - 1
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread