Re: Cocoa vs User: 0 - 1
Re: Cocoa vs User: 0 - 1
- Subject: Re: Cocoa vs User: 0 - 1
- From: Rosyna <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 09:28:33 -0700
What I am saying is that there is no reason NOT to add it to NSBundle
(if it doesn't already exist). It is a very small change and it seems
that NSBundle already supports FSRefs internally.
It just means that the developer has to do NOTHING special to get the
app to support the moving of itself. Just like in carbon. You'd have
to think you know better than Foundation in order to make your app
not support it.
Ack, at 4/17/04, Ondra Cada said:
Sigh. I *do* know that and how it is possible to write an
application which is resistent against moving. What I am stressing
out is that there is any number of application which *do not* do
that, and a vast majority of them never will. Heck, would you forbid
using of argv[0], too? Or would you advocate the BSD layer
dynamically changes process info if the process executable is moved?
And so forth, and so on.
--
Sincerely,
Rosyna Keller
Technical Support/Holy Knight/Always needs a hug
Unsanity: Unsane Tools for Insanely Great People
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.