Re: [Foo new] vs [[Foo alloc] init]: was Re: In-loop releasing of objects does not free memory?
Re: [Foo new] vs [[Foo alloc] init]: was Re: In-loop releasing of objects does not free memory?
- Subject: Re: [Foo new] vs [[Foo alloc] init]: was Re: In-loop releasing of objects does not free memory?
- From: Bill Bumgarner <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:57:32 -0800
On Feb 15, 2008, at 12:41 PM, Adam P Jenkins wrote:
As far as I understand, [Foo new] is exactly equivalent to [[Foo
alloc] init], unless Foo has overridden +new to do something else.
I've never understood why most example code shows [[Foo alloc] init]
when [Foo new] is shorter, and I always just use +new. Is there any
reason not to do that?_______________________________________________
Nope -- no reason at all. Works fine and is 100% equivalent as you
said.
b.bum
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden