Re: Why is it wrong to have relationships without an inverse in Core Data?
Re: Why is it wrong to have relationships without an inverse in Core Data?
- Subject: Re: Why is it wrong to have relationships without an inverse in Core Data?
- From: Scott Ribe <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 07:06:34 -0600
On Jun 23, 2013, at 7:51 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
> I'd have to do some more thinking as to whether that is a weakness in CoreData or not, but it seems to be erring in the ER direction.
Hmm. My own private ORM has no such pointers--instead using methods which rely on std::map's of primary keys to ids, and multimap's of primary keys to foreign keys...
--
Scott Ribe
email@hidden
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden