Re: Why is it wrong to have relationships without an inverse in Core Data?
Re: Why is it wrong to have relationships without an inverse in Core Data?
- Subject: Re: Why is it wrong to have relationships without an inverse in Core Data?
- From: Alex Zavatone <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 09:23:28 -0400
Scott, your use of the apostrophe is confusing, since those terms don't appear to be possessive or contractions
Instead of :
> std::map's of
and
> multimap's of
Did you mean
std::maps of
and
multimaps of ?
On Jun 24, 2013, at 9:06 AM, Scott Ribe wrote:
> On Jun 23, 2013, at 7:51 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
>
>> I'd have to do some more thinking as to whether that is a weakness in CoreData or not, but it seems to be erring in the ER direction.
>
> Hmm. My own private ORM has no such pointers--instead using methods which rely on std::map's of primary keys to ids, and multimap's of primary keys to foreign keys...
>
> --
> Scott Ribe
> email@hidden
> http://www.elevated-dev.com/
> (303) 722-0567 voice
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
>
> Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
> Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
>
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden