Re: Why is it wrong to have relationships without an inverse in Core Data?
Re: Why is it wrong to have relationships without an inverse in Core Data?
- Subject: Re: Why is it wrong to have relationships without an inverse in Core Data?
- From: Scott Ribe <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 07:47:36 -0600
On Jun 24, 2013, at 7:23 AM, Alex Zavatone wrote:
> Scott, your use of the apostrophe is confusing, since those terms don't appear to be possessive or contractions
>
> Instead of :
>> std::map's of
>
>
> and
>> multimap's of
>
>
> Did you mean
>
> std::maps of
>
> and
>
> multimaps of ?
I was treating them as acronyms, even though they are not, because of course there is no class named "maps" nor "multimaps" in the standard library.
--
Scott Ribe
email@hidden
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden